Notices by rysiek ✅ (rysiek@mastodon.social)

@jerry good to hear!

@Gargron @emelie so, horse d'oeuvres?

@rysiek

@rysiek

@lilithsaintcrow sorry, I think I need some space.

New keyboard, who dis?

@Elektrollart correction, *some* people have problem with these images. Many don't.

But yes, they need to be spread!

@brwyatt no. This is why we need better card tech and card companies not pushing bullshit down people's throats.

This is squarely on the card companies, we need to be clear about that.

@garfiald oh, it's a well known fact. Before a university community of any kind can be established, a hairdresser for the given group needs to be there already.

This is why universities were founded in large cities, afterall. The hairdressers were already there.

I mean, look at the names. Harvard comes from "Hair-ward". Oxford was "Fox-cord", a name of a kind of a thin red ponytail.

The problem is that these xenophobes are blocking the hairdresser. So the guy is technically right!

</sarcasm>

@philonerd but if you want to see copyright maximalists at work, have a watch:
http://goodcopybadcopy.net/
https://vimeo.com/19941622
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Internet%27s_Own_Boy

Or have a read:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sita_Sings_the_Blues#Copyright_problems
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz

@philonerd I'm going to say: we shall see what lawsuits and chilling effects we see in 2.5 years. You're basing your argument on cuddly promises made by copyright maximalist's propaganda site (look at the About Us section, it's basically copyright collectives, which I can go on a completely separate rant on). I am basing my argument on talking to lawyers and a having been doing reform activism for a decade.

I hope *you* are right.

@philonerd this whole thing is boxing internet culture in terms familiar to corporate lawyers. It completely ignores small creators (will huge platforms be required to pay them? how?), it completely ignores small platforms (the small-size exclusion expires after 3 years of operation).

We will see the chilling effects in 2 years. And fun copyright lawsuits will start in 2.5 years. Get your popcorn ready.

@philonerd huge platforms don't care, they have the money to pay for this. Small platforms -- like Fediverse instances -- are going to be screwed with their pants on whenever big business fancies.

@philonerd please define what "non-profit" means. Is m.s non-profit? Will masto.host (for-profit hosting personal instances) be affected? From talking to the lawyers: it is not clear.

And you can be 100% sure that the big business will interpret the law in a maximalist way: https://www.nytimes.com/1996/12/17/nyregion/ascap-asks-royalties-from-girl-scouts-and-regrets-it.html

And so, even if you're right there, what if an instance gets sued by big business? Will it afford legal defence?